What did it touch?
Treat every agent as an identity with standing access — because that's what it is.
- Risk score per agent, updated each run
- Data-movement rules enforced inline
- Session replay for anything held or blocked
- Alerts routed to your SIEM
We build the agents that run your workflows — and the console that watches them do it. Every tool call traced, every action scored, and anything that crosses a line held for a human before it lands.
Agents read your systems, move your data and act in your name — thousands of times a day, at machine speed. Most teams can see the output and nothing else.
Spectre closes that gap. The oversight you already expect over people, applied to the software working on their behalf.
Gartner expects two in five enterprises to demote or shut down their autonomous agents by 2027 — because the governance gaps only surfaced after something had already gone wrong in production.
Gartner · May 2026Sources — Gartner, "Applying Uniform Governance Across AI Agents Will Lead to Enterprise AI Agent Failure", May 2026, and enterprise application agent forecast, Aug 2025. IBM / Ponemon Institute, Cost of a Data Breach Report 2025. Ponemon Institute / DTEX, Cost of Insider Risks Global Report, 2025 and 2026 editions.
Four surfaces, one record. Everything an agent does lands in the same trail — so the team that ships it, the team that secures it and the team that has to explain it are all reading from one page.
Each prompt, tool call, file touched, row read and dollar spent is captured as a structured trace. Scrub back through any run and watch the agent reason in real time.
Spectre baselines each agent over its first runs, then scores the drift — a new tool, an odd hour, ten times the usual data volume, a retry loop that won't quit.
Rules run inline, before the call goes out. Keep an agent out of a field, cap what it can spend, and put a named human on anything above your threshold.
Every run is written to an append-only trail with its approvals attached. Pull an evidence pack for a date, an agent or a single decision, mapped to your framework.
14 steps · 6 tools · 2.4s · $0.031 · replayable
AGT-207 · 8.1× normal export volume · flagged at 03:14
Rules evaluate before the call leaves the agent. Median 4ms, 9ms at p99.
sha256 9f2c1ba7e4d0…8831 · append-only · exports to CSV, JSON, PDF
Security wants to know what got touched. Operations wants to know what got done. Legal wants to know who said yes. Same trail, three views.
Treat every agent as an identity with standing access — because that's what it is.
Throughput, cost and failure modes for the workflows you handed over.
An answer that holds up months later, without a forensic project.
Nothing blocks on day one. Spectre observes first — full traces, no enforcement — and only starts holding actions when you say so. You keep the code, the traces and the keys.
The full engagement →We sit with the team doing the job, map the workflow as it really runs, and pick the one with the clearest before-and-after. If nothing clears the bar, we say so.
Prompts, tools, memory and retrieval — plus the rules it runs under. What it can reach, what it can spend, and what it must ask about first, decided before a line of it ships.
Version-tracked in your repo, deployed to your AWS, Azure or GCP account, wired into the console from the first run. No agent runs dark, not even in staging.
Evals on every change, guardrails tuned against real traffic, and a weekly review of what got held and why. Your team takes the console over whenever they're ready.
Agents earn trust the way people do — by being watched at the start, and by having a record when someone asks.
“For a year I couldn't answer the simplest question anyone asked me about our agents — what did that one actually touch? Now it's a search box. In the first week it stopped a run writing to a system nobody had signed off on.”
Bring us an agent you already have, or a workflow you've been afraid to hand over. Your agents don't change: Spectre wraps the layer where they call tools, and the trail starts on the first call.